Op/Ed

If a king wants to impose a huge new business tax he can just do it. And that’s what King Obama did with his just-announced change to overtime pay for salaried employees.

Surely one of the most debated questions for historians after President Barack Obama’s eight years of economic and foreign policy mismanagement will be whether he was a deceiver or just deceived.

There are several conclusions we can draw from the King v Burwell decision, and like most dark clouds it has a few silver linings.

Paul's plan would “blow up” (his words) the incomprehensible U.S. tax code and start from scratch with a simple, low and fair tax.

He’s still the best of the Bushes. But is that enough to attract conservative primary voters who are demanding less of the same ole thing?

Health care stocks have been one of the best performing sectors over the past several years, especially thanks to Obamacare. But if plaintiffs win in King v. Burwell, will that decision send health care stocks into a tailspin?

As strange as it may sound, President Obama’s recent statements give the impression that he’s willing to let his health care law go on life support—if he can claim Republicans pulled the plug. 

Scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) manipulated the raw data from global temperatures.  

Insisting on sunset clauses would be a significant structural improvement in the function and efficiency of government at all levels, and would protect Americans from an ever-spreading snarl of outdated laws and regulations, administered by a government incompetent enough to allow them to accumulate in the first place.

If you are an older American headed toward retirement, there’s a good chance you will be poor. We can fix the problem of old and broke in America, if it weren’t for entrenched, status quo forces.